posted by davidt on Thursday September 05 2002, @09:00AM
Bertrand writes:

Came across this review of the Seattle show at PopMatters. While it isn't 100% positive, how can you complain when the writer says "Morrissey is as close to God as we mere mortals on earth could hope for"?

"Miserable Morrissey" has gotten older and wiser - Morrissey 22 August -- Seattle, by Rahul Gairola
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • I know what was truly lacking. Moz' underwear.

    He's so damned sexy!
    jade <[email protected]> -- Thursday September 05 2002, @10:43AM (#38995)
    (User #90 Info)
    Zip up your mouth!
  • I agree with most of that review, though I certainly don't agree that the band wasn't up to snuff. They were. We've all agreed that the show is too short, but even that didn't particularly bother me.

    Anyone have any news on the Vancouver shows?
    SickenedNow -- Thursday September 05 2002, @11:33AM (#39004)
    (User #6061 Info)
  • ....has morrissey ever played "a full hour-and-a-half/ two hour show?" i think the most i've heard from boots and videos over the years is maybe 72 minutes or so, INCLUDING the encore time :). I only wish it were 2 hours though. And wearing "all black???" When will these people ever get it right?
    nowmyheartisok -- Thursday September 05 2002, @12:04PM (#39008)
    (User #4875 Info)
  • Why does every article about Morrissey be completely POSITIVE? Isn't it okay with a decent amount of criticism? The article was not unfair in any way. from my point of view, this cloud of irritation that surrounds every posting about an article that's not "100 % postive" is truly ridiculous.
    Anonymous -- Thursday September 05 2002, @10:30PM (#39072)


[ home | terms of service ]