The Telegraph: "No record label will touch Morrissey – and that’s the music industry’s loss" (June 4, 2021)

TELEMMGLPICT000001898361_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqFNg083D4dwMls34BZ1qmE8GKtaQ95whYjsFIOC-QANE~2.jpg


Telegraph have done an opinion piece hoping Morrissey gets a new record deal - despite accusing him of supporting the EDL. 🙄

Edit: it would probably help if I remembered the link.


No record label will touch Morrissey – and that’s the music industry’s loss​

However objectionable you find the Smiths singer, he shouldn't be reduced to hawking his new album to the highest – or lowest – bidder
JAMES HALL 4 June 2021 • 2:10pm

The last 12 months have been unkind to us all. Even, it seems, rock stars living in Los Angeles. Morrissey, the pugnacious former Smiths singer, said this week that he’s had “the worst year of my life”.
On one level, sympathy may be in reasonably short supply. Partly because of the LA rock star thing but mainly because Morrissey has in recent years made a barrage of offensive pronouncements including swipes at the Chinese, seeming defences of individuals accused of sexual abuse and sympathy for groups such as the English Defence League. But all of this notwithstanding, the former king of bedroom melodrama has still had a genuine shocker.
Last summer his beloved mother died. In April he was lampooned in an episode of The Simpsons called Panic on the Streets of Springfield. The show featured a vegan singer from the 1980s called Quilloughby – complete with thick-rimmed glasses and a quiff – who sang in a band called the Snuffs. But Quilloughby turned out to be a figment of Lisa Simpson’s imagination and was actually an overweight, meat-eating man with anti-immigrant views. Morrissey’s manager called the episode “hurtful and racist”.
Advertisement

And last November, Morrissey was dropped by his record label. “We wish him well in the next chapter of his career,” BMG said in a statement at the time.
That’s a bad 12 months, indeed. Heaven knows he’s miserable now. But on Sunday Morrissey sprung a surprise on us all. “The worst year of my life concludes with the best album of my life,” he said. He has recorded Bonfire of Teenagers in LA, an album of 11 new songs with none-more-Morrissey titles such as Rebels Without Applause, My Funeral and Saint in a Stained Glass Window. His lack of a record deal? No problemo, as Bart Simpson might put it. A message on the singer’s website read: “Morrissey is unsigned. The album is available to the highest (or lowest) bidder."

That’s right. Morrissey’s new record will be sold to the highest record label bidder. My initial thought was “Poor lonely man”. It was accompanied by a slight sucking of teeth. “Bit embarrassing if no label buys it,” I mumbled to myself. But this was soon overridden by a feeling of “Why not?” There was even a dollop of respect there. It’s a ballsy thing to do. A bold "f––– you" to the system. How typically Morrissey.

Besides, traditional means of music distribution – whereby a label puts out an album by an artist to which it has paid an advance – have long since broken down. Technology and the streaming revolution have seen to that. There are countless examples of artists seeking alternative ways of releasing new music. And auctioning an album to a label is another addition to this list.

In 2007 Radiohead, out of contract with EMI, released In Rainbows as a pay-what-you-want download. This honesty box approach saw 62 per cent of downloaders paying nothing (but those who did pay spent an average of around £5 globally). Four years later the Kaiser Chiefs released The Future is Medieval as a create-your-own-album concept. The band streamed snippets of twenty songs online and let fans choose their 10 favourites for £7.50. In 2014 U2 famously gave away Songs of Innocence to 500 million iTunes users free of charge: it appeared on iPhones and iPads around the world (whether people wanted it or not – millions didn’t).

The point is, anything goes when it comes to getting an album out there. My favourite alternative release story probably relates to rap collective Wu-Tang Clan. In 2015 they printed just one CD copy of their album Once Upon a Time in Shaolin and auctioned it off as an art object. A legal stipulation meant that its contents could not exploited commercially until the year 2103. The CD was bought by businessman Martin Shkreli, who reportedly paid $2 million for it. But in 2018 Shkreli was convicted for securities fraud and a federal court seized his assets, including the Wu-Tang album.

I hope the Morrissey album is picked up. Because despite his stupid pronouncements he is on something of a musical roll. When he was dropped by BMG he said that his three albums with them – 2017’s Low in High School, 2019’s California Son, and last year’s I Am Not A Dog on a Chain – were the best of his career. “I stand by them till death,” he said. While not quite up there with Vauxhall and I or Viva Hate, they are very strong records.

Last year’s single Bobby, Don’t You Think They Know? featured Don’t Leave Me This Way singer Thelma Houston on guest vocals. It’s an epic and slightly bonkers track that is completely absorbing. And 2017 single Spent the Day in Bed is up there with his best solo work.

This isn’t to say that Morrissey would be an easy artist to have on your roster. He was the final performer I reviewed before lockdown kicked in last year. His gig in Leeds in March 2020 was typical of the man: he slated critics, largely ignored his hits, and at one point mock-sneezed on the crowd to make some kind of point about Covid-19. Perhaps if he’d known what was around the corner, he’d have been more circumspect.

Or perhaps not. A comment on his website at the weekend about his upcoming Las Vegas residency (called Viva Moz Vegas) said the following: “Morrissey’s 5 nights at Caesar’s Palace in Las Vegas start on August 28, and there are no anti-social distancing or facial concealment rules in place.”

But however "toxic" people find Morrissey, there are many musicians who have done things far worse than him who have record contracts. There are members of rock bands with record deals who’ve spent time in prison for domestic abuse; meanwhile it was reported last year that a British drill rapper was offered a record deal while in prison awaiting trial for murder. No matter how abhorrent you may find Morrissey's opinions, he's committed no crime.

So here’s my message to labels: take a deep breath and snap up Bonfire of Teenagers. It’ll probably be quite good. And you might just cheer up music’s biggest grump.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
L

Lujissey.

Guest
There's god when I found out I had sneezed in the middle of the recital I wanted to kill him!!! Things that don't add up and aren't forgotten !!! But then I forgave him ,how not to forgive him!!! Moooozz!!Moz coming out of the bonfire and without injuries!!!!!
 
REBEL WITHOUT APPLAUSE


That's genius RIGHT THERE



NO ONE CAN TOUCH




Morrissey has more range than Sir John Falstaff, than Dylan , than Picasso, than anyone


I work at a prominent museum in north America, and we have been marveling about this all day . . .



We get the villains and heroes we deserve


In my own sick way,
 
R

RIP Moz 1959-2021

Guest
I can assure you it’s no loss for the music industry. The only L is for the fascist Morrissey. Post his demise in Vegas he’ll no longer have to worry about being signed to a label.
 
L

Lujissey.

Guest
We'll all get what. We want to hear Moz's new album, but I just hope it's soon,
 

Uncleskinny

It's all good
Subscriber
Who is to blame for this horrific situation? We need names!

No one will touch him because it won't sell, he has racist mates, and he'll tell the record company to f*** off and blame them for everything.

Who could resist such a proposition?
 

Uncleskinny

It's all good
Subscriber
'He has committed no crime' - wrong.
He has committed heresy against the new religion of woke and must be burned at the stake.
Now he knows how Joan of Arc felt.
Let me translate that for you...

"He has said a load of stuff that turn off the buying public so no-one will part with their money for his product and as a result no record company will spend money to lose money"

Also - it seems to me that you are comfortable with him consorting with racists. Wonder why that might be?
 

Eldritch

Well-Known Member
The article is okay and does have a point -- but on the other hand the record companies do have a right to decide who to sign. One also can't complain about not being hired, if one asks for an unreasonable salary.
 

Stephen Hofmann

Well-Known Member
Who is to blame for this horrific situation? We need names!

No one will touch him because it won't sell, he has racist mates, and he'll tell the record company to f*** off and blame them for everything.

Who could resist such a proposition?

Meanwhile grime "music", probably the most destructive form of music ever created, is lauded by white middle-class Guardian types, as city's across the country's revel in blood-red machetes. F-off you twat.
 

NealCassidy

FREE SPEECH #FBPB
Let me translate that for you...

"He has said a load of stuff that turn off the buying public so no-one will part with their money for his product and as a result no record company will spend money to lose money"

Also - it seems to me that you are comfortable with him consorting with racists. Wonder why that might be?
Is he a racist , or does he ‘consort’ with racists? Make your mind up.
 

Janice

Well-Known Member
Let me translate that for you...

"He has said a load of stuff that turn off the buying public so no-one will part with their money for his product and as a result no record company will spend money to lose money"

Also - it seems to me that you are comfortable with him consorting with racists. Wonder why that might be?
God, you really are a boring specimen.
Why are you so bothered ?
You are a stupid person. I think that sums it up.
Is there a Def Leppard forum you can not just piss off to.

T-shirt anyone???
 

gashonthenail

Well-Known Member
Let me translate that for you...

"He has said a load of stuff that turn off the buying public so no-one will part with their money for his product and as a result no record company will spend money to lose money"

Also - it seems to me that you are comfortable with him consorting with racists. Wonder why that might be?

You wrote several sentences there without mentioning 'folk with brown skin'. Well done.
 

Amy

from the Ice Age to the dole age
I can't help but respect how much Morrissey refuses to back down and take a 'smaller' deal, how much he won't compromise or say the right things, will continue to annoy the industry and be a difficult bastard to the end. He just can't be swayed, sold or coerced on any level, even if it kills his career - and who else can say that? He's a one-off.
 

Emotional Guide Dog

Chairman Of The Bored
Morrissey's always been a strange chicken when it comes to record labels. He wants the big names but he doesn't want to play the game.

I fancy that Morrissey needs some money to pay the help and wants a label to provide it.
 

Trending Threads

Top Bottom