12 dead soldiers, 30 injured, at Ft. Hood

[nogodsnomasters85]

5,317 - 8,109
That's the estimate for the amount of civilian deaths which have occured as a direct result of US military action in Afghanistan since 2001. If you count in indirect deaths, it could be as many as 28,028. Just thought I'd shed some perspective on the situation!

Good point. Something we should all bear in mind...

 

[Cassius]

I finally heard from my friend today, she and her boyfriend are fine. She told me that Obama is supposed to be going there tomorrow for a memorial service.

 

[Theo]

Republican politicians and talking heads have no concern about how offensive they are being.

And, you idiot, since when is the physical attractiveness of a government official relevant to their leadership?

Oh, well, this is a Morrissey site. I recall Morrissey attacking Tony Blair's physical features in his interviews (his teeth, for example), and you all took that as quite "intellectual". I'm just throwing the shit back at you leftists. I can't imagine anyone wanting to have sex with Nancy Pelosi -- can you? She is truly repulsive on every level, inside and out. But I guess you're a big fan of Nancy Pelosi?

See, Nancy Pelosi has warned America:

"I have concerns about some of the language that is being used because I saw … I saw this myself in the late ’70s in San Francisco,” Pelosi said, choking up and with tears forming in her eyes. “This kind of rhetoric is just, is really frightening and it created a climate in which we, violence took place and … I wish that we would all, again, curb our enthusiasm in some of the statements that are made."

She's referring to when Democrat Dan White murdered Democrat Mayor Moscone and Democrat Harvey Milk (btw: Milk was a big fan of Jim Jones, who killed over 900 people in Jonestown). A bunch of violence amongst a bunch of lefty Democrats in San Francisco in the '70s. What on earth does that have to to with entirely peaceful protests by Tea Partiers in 2009?

Maybe we should ask the Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, who has been spending her time worrying about all the "terrorists" at the Tea Party protests. You know, those entirely peaceful people simply protesting government policies they disgaree with, who have not injured or harmed a fly (though a few of them may have crafted a sign here or there that is a bit carried away)? Those are the big terrorists, apparently.

But we must not jump to conclusions about this filthy barbarian who mass-murdered people at Fort Hood. No, we should do like Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm!) and just jump to conclusions about a police officer who was unfortunate enough to be called by a 911 report to the home of an asshole, full-of-himself college professor who happened to be friends with Obama. Obama took about 5 minutes before suggesting the cop is a stupid racist -- or, as Obama put it in his campaign, "a typical white person". Actually, Barack, it was your college prof buddy who was the STUPID RACIST.

And we should jump to conclusions about anyone who protests the policies of Obama in entirely peaceful fashion, because Democrats "just know" that they are "racists" who will "go off" in a rage of violence.

Yes, the Muslim lunatic who was saying the infidels should either be beheaded or have boiling oil poured down their throats, and who was communicating with the same crazy imams as the 9/11 terrorists, and who creeped out patients and co-workers alike, and who was trying to contact al Qaeda, ect ect etc -- HE IS SOMEONE WE MUST NOT JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS ABOUT....EVEN AFTER HE JUST MASS-MURDERED A BUNCH OF SOLDIERS AT FORT HOOD!

How ridiculous are we getting?

 

[Theo]

Originally Posted by Theo
BTW, if you've seen the name of the gunman, well...no surprise there.....

That seriously made my blood boil. You have a lot to learn.

Oh, I'm sorry your blood boiled.

Well, actually, as the founding member of the Theo Van Gogh Martyrs Brigade, I probably take your boiling blood with a hearty laugh?

Since we're speaking of boiling liquids, Major Nidal Malik Hasan was quoted as saying that non-Muslims should have boiling oil poured down their throats. Boy, that's a really sane statement from a licensed psychiatrist!

I didn't mean to boil your blood. I thought I was having a perfectly natural reaction to the news of the day. Some of us forget to check in with the PC police before we decide how we feel about events. Maybe I need to be sent to a re-education camp or something? Until then, I'd rather make your blood boil than allow another Muslim barbarian mass-murder a bunch of people.

Strange how the Muslim atrocity didn't make your blood boil, but some blowhard's post on SoLow did.....

 

[Theo]

5,317 - 8,109
That's the estimate for the amount of civilian deaths which have occured as a direct result of US military action in Afghanistan since 2001. If you count in indirect deaths, it could be as many as 28,028. Just thought I'd shed some perspective on the situation!

Well, gee, the leftists said before we went to Afghanistan that millions were gonna die in Afghanistan in a "silent genocide" due to mass starvation and so forth, unless we intervened. We actually averted mass-sarvation in that country, but you'll never talk about that now. Because you're just a propagandist. And so now you're busy supporting the Taliban, a completely f***ed-up, evil bunch of Muslim barbarians.

But you're a "good guy" because you oppose American foreign policy. Did you ever think that maybe shit is bigger than your silly anti-American trendiness? For example, at the time of 9/11, the Taliban and Pakistan's intelligence agency were in cahoots with each other (the Taliban comes from Pakistan). Pakistan has nuclear weapons. The Taliban was giving safe harbor to Usama bin Laden. Does someone have to slap you around before you realize that there was a vital need to take action?

Sometimes I wish that the anti-American crowd could be sent to an alternate world where all the shit that would've happened if the USA and its allies (especially Great Britain) had not saved the day had actually come to pass. And let them suffer in it as they deserve.

So, anyway, tell me why we weren't supposed to go into Afghanistan after 9/11? Even Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm!) said it was "the right war". (Although, now that he's Commander-in-Chief he doesn't seem to know what he thinks, and appears to wish he could just vote "present" as he used to do in the Senate.)

Yes, I do recall Obama talking tough about Afghanistan and Pakistan in the campaign, but I guess it was just, "Say anything to get elected," from that chimpanzee. We have to remember that this is the guy who was 100% wrong about the surge in Iraq, and we have to fear he'll be as wrong now as he was then. *sigh*

And we have a lot of lies from Obama.

Like this one:

[YouTube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YouTube]

("You lie" - Joe Wilson. This has already proved to be a lie in my life, so what is the deal with this chimp?)


BTW, I'd like to know more about your estimates of "civilians" killed in Afghanistan. Just how many of those are truly "civilians"?

 

[withmyheadonthebar]

http://exiledonline.com/fort-hood-massacre-a-brief-history-of-american-violence/

 

[Theo]

http://exiledonline.com/fort-hood-massacre-a-brief-history-of-american-violence/

And what parts of the stupid article you link to do you actually agree with? Do you care to think with your own brain and put your own opinons in here, or just put in URLs to other people's thoughts?

 

[Theo]

What were the warning signs,Theo ?

You don't follow the news? If I have to sit here and report the basic news that ought to be common knowledge, that would be pretty sad.....

 

[Theo]

He can keep spinning the 10.2% unemployment rate:

Here's a less partisan chart:

Notice that we see what Obama's economic team said the unemployment rate would be without his stimulus, and also what his economic team said the umemployment rate would be with the stimulus. Notice that the actual unemployment rate is far above both, proving that his economic team was completely wrong and should be canned sooner than immediately.

Obama's team said that it would be a disaster if we didn't pass his stimulus plan, based on their forecasts with and without the stimulus as shown in the chart above. The actual unemployment rate far exceeds what he called the disaster we'd hit if we didn't go along with his scheme.

The true unemployment rate is far higher than the outrageous 10.2% disaster, btw. The effective unemployment rate is around 17+% right now. Way to go, Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm!).....

And he calls the folks protesting his failed schemes in a peaceful manner a bunch of potential "violent terrorists". But we mustn't jump to conclusions about the terrorist who just mass-murdered a bunch of people at Ft. Hood. Maybe that Muslim was just suffering from Pre-Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder! He wasn't a fan of Glenn Beck, so how bad could he be???

How ridiculous are we getting?

 

[Theo]

Here's a less partisan chart:

Notice that we see what Obama's economic team said the unemployment rate would be without his stimulus, and also what his economic team said the umemployment rate would be with the stimulus. Notice that the actual unemployment rate is far above both, proving that his economic team was completely wrong and should be canned sooner than immediately.

Obama's team said that it would be a disaster if we didn't pass his stimulus plan, based on their forecasts with and without the stimulus as shown in the chart above. The actual unemployment rate far exceeds what he called the disaster we'd hit if we didn't go along with his scheme.

The true unemployment rate is far higher than the outrageous 10.2% disaster, btw. The effective unemployment rate is around 17+% right now. Way to go, Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm!).....

And he calls the folks protesting his failed schemes in a peaceful manner a bunch of potential "violent terrorists". But we mustn't jump to conclusions about the terrorist who just mass-murdered a bunch of people at Ft. Hood. Maybe that Muslim was just suffering from Pre-Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder! He wasn't a fan of Glenn Beck, so how bad could he be???

How ridiculous are we getting?

The Obamites of SoLow cannot refute these unemployment figures, so they will not reply to these posts.

The Obama administration is, as a matter of fact, wrong. And if you protest the fact that they are wrong, you are a "tea bagging" potential "terrorist". They will jump to instantaneous conclusions about you, in that case. But slow down before you jump to conclusions about the Muslim maniac who mass-murdered a bunch of people a Ft. Hood.

 

[withmyheadonthebar]

And what parts of the stupid article you link to do you actually agree with? Do you care to think with your own brain and put your own opinons in here, or just put in URLs to other people's thoughts?

Yes, I can think with my own brain (it would be difficult to think with someone else's brain, after all). However, I am not as articulate as some other people, and if someone else says something better than I can, I will post the link. But thanks for your comment.

 

[MunchyBrain]

Well, gee, the leftists said before we went to Afghanistan that millions were gonna die in Afghanistan in a "silent genocide" due to mass starvation and so forth, unless we intervened. We actually averted mass-sarvation in that country, but you'll never talk about that now. Because you're just a propagandist. And so now you're busy supporting the Taliban, a completely f***ed-up, evil bunch of Muslim barbarians.

But you're a "good guy" because you oppose American foreign policy. Did you ever think that maybe shit is bigger than your silly anti-American trendiness? For example, at the time of 9/11, the Taliban and Pakistan's intelligence agency were in cahoots with each other (the Taliban comes from Pakistan). Pakistan has nuclear weapons. The Taliban was giving safe harbor to Usama bin Laden. Does someone have to slap you around before you realize that there was a vital need to take action?

Sometimes I wish that the anti-American crowd could be sent to an alternate world where all the shit that would've happened if the USA and its allies (especially Great Britain) had not saved the day had actually come to pass. And let them suffer in it as they deserve.

So, anyway, tell me why we weren't supposed to go into Afghanistan after 9/11? Even Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm Mmm Mmm!) said it was "the right war". (Although, now that he's Commander-in-Chief he doesn't seem to know what he thinks, and appears to wish he could just vote "present" as he used to do in the Senate.)

Yes, I do recall Obama talking tough about Afghanistan and Pakistan in the campaign, but I guess it was just, "Say anything to get elected," from that chimpanzee. We have to remember that this is the guy who was 100% wrong about the surge in Iraq, and we have to fear he'll be as wrong now as he was then. *sigh*

And we have a lot of lies from Obama.

Like this one:

[YouTube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YouTube]

("You lie" - Joe Wilson. This has already proved to be a lie in my life, so what is the deal with this chimp?)


BTW, I'd like to know more about your estimates of "civilians" killed in Afghanistan. Just how many of those are truly "civilians"?

I don't support the Taliban, I don't support anyone who kills unarmed civilians. The fact is that the NATO presence in Afghanistan is increasing the (incredibly small) risk of terror attacks to the US and UK. Can you not see that for children growing up in Afghanistan, having their innocently family murdered by the US drastically increases the chance of them hating the US and wanting revenge when they're older?

Also, for future reference, I'm not a guy.

 

[Oh my god. it's Robby!]

I don't support the Taliban, I don't support anyone who kills unarmed civilians. The fact is that the NATO presence in Afghanistan is increasing the (incredibly small) risk of terror attacks to the US and UK. Can you not see that for children growing up in Afghanistan, having their innocently family murdered by the US drastically increases the chance of them hating the US and wanting revenge when they're older?

sorry Munchie, Theo is blind

Also, for future reference, I'm not a guy.

 

[Theo]

Originally Posted by MunchyBrain
I don't support the Taliban, I don't support anyone who kills unarmed civilians. The fact is that the NATO presence in Afghanistan is increasing the (incredibly small) risk of terror attacks to the US and UK. Can you not see that for children growing up in Afghanistan, having their innocently family murdered by the US drastically increases the chance of them hating the US and wanting revenge when they're older?

sorry Munchie, Theo is blind

Yes, I am blind. But I can see evil Muslims and their appeasers.....

Robby, do you actually believe that the USA and UK are "murdering" innocent families in Afghanistan, as this person you quote claims? Or are you being a political troll again to get my blood boiling?

My warning to Afghans: If they are chilling with a bunch of al Qaeda, they shouldn't be suprised if a predator drone's hellfire missile blows 'em up and sends 'em to Allah. If that makes President Obama a "murderer", you can call me a murderer too. (But I take it with a grain of salt. It doesn't take much to get called a "murderer" on SoLow. All you gotta do is put a Chicken McNugget in your mouth and you are convicted, and there'll be no mitigation if all you really wanted was a Happy Meal Teenie Beanie Baby.)

But I'd like to know under what conditions we're allowed to strike at the enemy that would satisfy you.

(And, isn't MunchyBrain that pro-violence anarchist who likes assaulting police officers at left-wing protests, or is my memory confusing him/her with another screenname?)

 

[Theo]

CNN has alerted me to a despicable bunch of New York goat-f***ers who are in love with Usama bin Laden. They have a web site called Revolution Muslim.

[YouTube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0yDuG7vgeSk&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0yDuG7vgeSk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YouTube]

They are taking much glee from the Ft. Hood atrocity.

They have even posted this mockery about one of the victims of this terrorist mass-murder:

Disgusting Muslims.

(Hey, guess what? Your new hero was shot by a woman. And Major Hasan seemed to have a lot of "woman issues". Spent the weeks before his mass-murder spree at the strip clubs! Typical. But refused to appear in photos with females, and acted like a freako around females. Went around to the mosques asking if they could arrange a wife for him. Psh. That's why I mentioned his sexism in a previous post. The freako Muslims all seem to have serious issues about women.)

I have alerted this group in their comments section that they are now being monitored by the Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade.

For your information
Wednesday, 11 November 2009 07:06 (Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade)

You are now on our radar.

*spit*

--Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade

For now, we are just watching.

(Our government is so pathetic, though, that the FBI will now probably be coming after the Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade. So be it.)

 

[Theo]

The Obamites of SoLow cannot refute these unemployment figures, so they will not reply to these posts.

The Obama administration is, as a matter of fact, wrong. And if you protest the fact that they are wrong, you are a "tea bagging" potential "terrorist". They will jump to instantaneous conclusions about you, in that case. But slow down before you jump to conclusions about the Muslim maniac who mass-murdered a bunch of people a Ft. Hood.

As I said, the Obamites of SoLow have nothing to say about the unemployment figures, because the facts prove that their Boy Wonder's economic team is incompetent.

Or are they? Since all of us who are appalled by what's going on in America under this single-party Democrat rule are putting aside our differences and uniting, I have been listening a lot more to right-wing talk radio. There's a lot of interesting things being said on those shows. One theory is that Obama's team is intentionally destroying the U.S. economy in order to make the people more receptive to socialism. That would explain why Obama has not yet fired his economic team now that they have been proven wrong with disastrous results, but is instead pushing for another stimulus plan on the heels of the failed one. Maybe they do know what they're doing, and the skyrocketing unemployment figures are part of the plan? I'm merely airing this theory, and I hope it's not true.

 

[Theo]

In another victory for Fox News Channel's Glenn Beck:

White House Communications Director Anita Dunn is stepping down after a brief tenure marked by a dust-up with Fox News Channel over its coverage. She will be succeeded by her deputy, Dan Pfeiffer.

This was the stupid woman who told a graduating class that Mao is one of her favorite political philosophers, one of the people she turns to most.

[YouTube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HiBDpL2dExY&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HiBDpL2dExY&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YouTube]

She went to war with Fox News because they aren't in the tank for Obama the way other media outlets are. And now she is gone. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

 

[Theo]

[YouTube]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q8erePM8V5U&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YouTube]

Some people in the media are writing articles about whether or not Obama's latest schemes will break the firm pledge he made to the people (see video above) during the campaign. I don't know what their deal is. I'm getting hit by one of Obama's new taxes every single day, so that proves he was a dirty liar:

Like a bad April Fools' Day joke, the federal excise tax on cigarettes increased April 1, 2009 by 156 percent (or 61 cents per pack). And this is a tax that everyone who smokes will pay, despite the fact that, according to the taxpayers' lobby Americans for Tax Reform, one in four smokers live below the poverty line and 55 percent of smokers can be defined as "working poor," which means they make something less than $250,000.00 per year.

I realize that smokers are not the most sympathetic group in the USA. But just who is it that Obama thinks is suffering the most under this tax? It would be the bruthas and sistas in the hood trying to scrounge up change for another pack of Newports. And a lie is a lie, and a firm pledge is a firm pledge, and "any form of tax increases" means, well, any form of tax increases. Don't say it if you don't mean it.

 

[I am a Ghost]

Kimberly Munley is a bona fide heroine.

 

[iamnicola]

R.I.P. Maj. Libardo Eduardo Caraveo