It’s not about politics

Oh course you didn't "say it was their fault." You're very careful not to "say" much of anything ever and if you do you can be counted on most of the time to "say" something contradictory as soon as someone disagrees.
But what you did is implied it was their fault by "saying" they could have gotten off the bus which makes sense to you somehow. That's something that you did "say" and in looking to the victims for fault where there was none you came up with one that makes no sense at all.
If they had gotten off the bus and the boys had gotten off the bus with them on some random street, how do you think that might have worked out?

Your reliance on repetition of what other people "say" and your total lack of ability to contribute anything of your own that even makes sense make me wonder why you bother. It's like you wanted to be part of the conversation that was started by @reelfountain where the point was that these women are probably lying. The context was based on two things. First is that blacks were probably responsible and the second was that the media was making a big deal out of this because the women are lesbians. She wrote about it quite a bit and if I remember correctly part of it was that the media wanted to make it about the women being lesbians and the other part was that it was probably their fault.
So you pop up with this idea that they could have and should have got off the bus, as if that would be easy, and as if that would solve the problem.
But of course you didn't "say it was their fault" because you perpetuate this image of being completely unbiased, even though that isn't true at all.

#davesplaining :lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf:
 
Oh course you didn't "say it was their fault." You're very careful not to "say" much of anything ever and if you do you can be counted on most of the time to "say" something contradictory as soon as someone disagrees.
But what you did is implied it was their fault by "saying" they could have gotten off the bus which makes sense to you somehow. That's something that you did "say" and in looking to the victims for fault where there was none you came up with one that makes no sense at all.
If they had gotten off the bus and the boys had gotten off the bus with them on some random street, how do you think that might have worked out?

Your reliance on repetition of what other people "say" and your total lack of ability to contribute anything of your own that even makes sense make me wonder why you bother. It's like you wanted to be part of the conversation that was started by @reelfountain where the point was that these women are probably lying. The context was based on two things. First is that blacks were probably responsible and the second was that the media was making a big deal out of this because the women are lesbians. She wrote about it quite a bit and if I remember correctly part of it was that the media wanted to make it about the women being lesbians and the other part was that it was probably their fault.
So you pop up with this idea that they could have and should have got off the bus, as if that would be easy, and as if that would solve the problem.
But of course you didn't "say it was their fault" because you perpetuate this image of being completely unbiased, even though that isn't true at all.
You just about came to terms with women loving getting raped and now this.

You're getting there!

giphy.gif
 
#davesplaining :lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf::lbf:
I dunno but I actually like Dave!

Shocker I know. I wouldn't mind taking him up on his offer and fly over to visit him.

Something tells me he has gorgeous sisters and knows some really hot babes around where he lives. He throws cool movie style american parties with everyone throwing toilet paper in the trees.

I thin he is even in with the black cool people throwing rap parties where real gangbangers show up and threaten you all cool.

We should defo go on a visit you and me Bhops!
 
I dunno but I actually like Dave!

Shocker I know. I wouldn't mind taking him up on his offer and fly over to visit him.

Something tells me he has gorgeous sisters and knows some really hot babes around where he lives. He throws cool movie style american parties with everyone throwing toilet paper in the trees.

I thin he is even in with the black cool people throwing rap parties where real gangbangers show up and threaten you all cool.

We should defo go on a visit you and me Bhops!
Well we might score a behind-the-scenes look at an American Kmart, so there is that.
 
Oh course you didn't "say it was their fault." You're very careful not to "say" much of anything ever and if you do you can be counted on most of the time to "say" something contradictory as soon as someone disagrees.
But what you did is implied it was their fault by "saying" they could have gotten off the bus which makes sense to you somehow. That's something that you did "say" and in looking to the victims for fault where there was none you came up with one that makes no sense at all.
If they had gotten off the bus and the boys had gotten off the bus with them on some random street, how do you think that might have worked out?

Your reliance on repetition of what other people "say" and your total lack of ability to contribute anything of your own that even makes sense make me wonder why you bother. It's like you wanted to be part of the conversation that was started by @reelfountain where the point was that these women are probably lying. The context was based on two things. First is that blacks were probably responsible and the second was that the media was making a big deal out of this because the women are lesbians. She wrote about it quite a bit and if I remember correctly part of it was that the media wanted to make it about the women being lesbians and the other part was that it was probably their fault.
So you pop up with this idea that they could have and should have got off the bus, as if that would be easy, and as if that would solve the problem.
But of course you didn't "say it was their fault" because you perpetuate this image of being completely unbiased, even though that isn't true at all.

:eek:

HOLY GREEN TOMATO!!:confused:

'you can be counted to not say much of anything EVER and when you do you then MOST of the time you say something contradictory'o_O
 
The chinese demand that people scan their faces to be able to buy a smartphone. Bad news for Robby whose face will never fit into any picture.

pvtpyle.jpg
 
So cold in Sweden Greta Thunberg has decided to make her own crack. She will be seen with a lighter trying furiously to make things warmer by setting everything on fire.
 
"Michael Bloomberg owns 3 planes,

2 helicopters,

6 boats,

11 houses,

42 cars,

And says that you should take the bus to help fight climate change.

These candidates are all jokes.

Ryan Fournier
@RyanAFournier"
 
The parade of Jews who want to bring Trump to justice
G%C3%A4stskribent-54.png

Of Guest Writer ,2019-12-03
[email protected]

5
JUDICIAL POWER. Author Thomas Dalton sees that it is the Jewish power elite trying to sabotage the work of the US president. But it is also the same elite that lifts him to the presidential post.


Behind Donald Trump's advances and adversities are various phalanges within the Jewish lobby.

In the midst of the ongoing campaign to try to get Donald Trump to stand before state law, we have had the pleasure of seeing a rare spectacle - an unusually clear display of Jewish power and influence. Individual parts of the overall picture are well known, although a complete evaluation of the situation remains to be done.

A close look at the situation clearly shows the dominance and corruption of the Jewish elite in America and their global networks. It is worth documenting what is happening now "for the future" - and drawing some conclusions from it.

Let's start from the beginning: All the recent US presidents have been deeply involved in Jewish relations, but few on a personal level like Trump, considering that his daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism for the marriage of Jared Kushner , an Orthodox Jew.

The only other presidents who had close personal ties to the Jews were probably partly Jews themselves: Teddy and Franklin Delano Roosevelt , and perhaps Lyndon Johnson . Apart from these family contacts, Trump has a crowd of heavy Jewish donors: Lew Eisenberg , Sheldon and Miriam Adelson , Mel Sembler , Ron Weiser , Steve Wynn , Elliott Brody , Laurie Perlmutter , Carl Icahn , and not least Bernie Marcus .

Furthermore, his entire predominantly Jewish staff and professional contacts include Avi Berkowitz , the now incarcerated Michael Cohen , Gary Cohn , Reed Cordish , Boris Epshteyn , David Friedman , Jason Greenblatt , Larry Kudlow , Stephen Miller , Steven Mnuchin , Jay Sekulow , David Shulkin and Allen Weisselberg . All those Trump defenders in America should be concerned about his extensive ties to the people of Israel.

But let's put all these individuals aside for the moment. The ongoing process of trying to get Trump to justice is closely linked to events in Ukraine, of all places. Jews in Ukraine have come to play a surprisingly prominent role in the development. That nation has a long history of conflicts with Jewish groups that stretch back more than a thousand years.

Their number grew over time and amounted to approximately three million individuals in the early 1900s. Estimates today claim that there are between 200,000 and 400,000 Jews living in the country, which represents less than one percent of the total Ukrainian population of 42 million. Yet, in the same way as in many other countries around the world, the Jews exert a remarkable and disproportionate power in that country - just as in ours.


The President of Ukraine, the Jew Volodymyr Zelensky.

As we know, the ongoing events originate in many ways in a telephone conversation that took place in July between Trump and the recently elected Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky .

The 41-year-old Zelensky was born in Ukraine "by Jewish parents" as it is commonly called, and created a name as a comedian in the entertainment industry. He became famous for playing the role of president in a Saturday Night Live -like television program, but decided after a whim to actually seek out the real presidential post in the country - and won the election in March 2019.

Worth noting is that it was reported that " Zelensky did not mention his Jewish identity in interviews before or during the campaign, which critics consider to be an intentional avoidance" . This was clearly a successful strategy in the light of the historical conflicts between the Jewish and Ukrainian peoples; as the modern crypto-Jew Zelensky is, he has learned the lesson well.

The key issue in this began in connection with the placement of Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden on the board of the Ukrainian gas energy company Burisma in April 2014, a position he held for five years. The leading player in Bursima is incidentally Mykola (Nikolaij) Zolochvsky - a man who, with his Jewish surname, almost certainly belongs to the Hebrew tribe.

Hunter received compensation for his services in the order of $ 500,000 per year, and the Ukrainians indirectly gained access to Vice President Biden and then-President Barack Obama . Trump's phone call was an incident in a chain that obviously sought to expose corruption and abuse of power from father and son Biden, with the claim that he did it for his own personal gain.

wh_biden_veterans_day-460x250.jpg

Biden & son. Photo: US Government (CC0).

The process
On September 24, Nancy Pelosi announced thestart of the judicial process through the formation of six House of Representatives committees, each of which would have a role to play in the process. Of the six chairmen of these committees, three are Jews: Adam Schiff (Intelligence Committee), Jerry Nadler (JusticeCommittee), and Eliot Engel (Foreign Policy Committee).

Testimony behind closed doors would begin on October 11, and the public hearings on November 13. So far, Schiff and his committee have received all the attention because it was his committee that led the public hearing phase, where Schiff himself had the lead role. Nadler's committee is supposed to write the actual national court documents, and Engels's group is to provide unspecified assistance in the case. The three non-Jewish committees will probably only be assigned routine and ceremonial roles.

But even before the initial phase behind closed doors could begin, Jews in Ukraine reappeared. On October 9, the news came that two partners of Trump's lawyer Rudi Giluiani were arrested at Dulles Airport as they were leaving the country - two Jews from Ukraine and American citizens - named Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman . They are being prosecuted for unspecified activities that, according to the Washington Post , deal with " a complex network of financial and political interaction that links to alleged violations of campaign finance laws ".

Their connection with Giuliani goes back at least two years; they apparently first hired him as a kind of consultant, and then they switched so that they started working for him instead as the pressure grew to investigate both men Biden and Burisma. Apparently, Parnas and Fruman had the right Ukrainian (and Jewish) contacts to get the job done. But the exact circumstances surrounding their criminal activities have not yet been revealed.


A hearing room in the congress. Photo: Facebook.

The public hearings began, as mentioned, November 13, As master of ceremonies and chief to pull the strings, Schiff oversaw the entire two-week public process and conducted many of the hearings himself. But much was also led by the leading Jewish lawyer for the Intelligence Committee, Daniel Sachs Goldman . Goldman has family ties to the (Jewish) corporate empire Levi Strauss, which provides him with a fortune of considerable size.

It was decided that twelve people would testify publicly. Among them were two other Jews: Alexander Vindman and Gordon Sondland . Vindman is another example of a man with connections to Ukraine. He and his one-twin were born there in 1975, came to the United States in 1979, and became American citizens. He rose rapidly within the US intelligence service and began working for the National Security Council in March 2018. Vindman was involved in the now infamous telephone call in July; he refused to negotiate to share his experiences in the case, and was therefore called to testify.

Sondland is a 62-year-old Jew from the state of Washington who made a considerable fortune in the hotel industry. Through a handful of privately owned companies, he donated $ 1 million in rounds to Trump's presidential campaign, and as a result, in March 2018, he was named US Ambassador to the EU. Sundland then became one in the horde of Jewish ambassadors, including fellows such as Philip Goldberg (Colombia), Robin Bernstein (Dominican Republic), Jonathan Cohen (Egypt) , David Cornstein (Hungary) , David Friedman (Israel) , Lewis Eisenberg (Italy) , Lawrence Silverman (Kuwait) , and Daniel Rosenblum(Uzbekistan).

When these two gentlemen came to testify, it became a veritable spectacle: A Jew (Schiff) who led the negotiations at the hearing of Jews (Vindman and Sondland) by another Jew (Goldman). It was a remarkable scene: You could have apologized if you thought it was a case in the Knesset rather than in the US Congress.

As the negotiations proceeded with the other witnesses, a number of references were made not only to Zelensky but also to a mysterious and obscure group of people, the so-called "Ukrainian oligarchs". It turns out that this elite group, like their counterparts in Russia, is largely Jewish. Of the five richest and most influential Ukrainian billionaires, four are Jews: Rinat Akhmetov , Viktor Pinchuk , Ihor Kolomoyskij , and Gennadiy Bogolyubov . Just below them in the hierarchy of Ukraine are Jewish multimillionaires such as Oleksandr Feldman and Hennadiy Korban. These people exercise great power in Ukraine, often instead of official government agencies; they are, in effect, their own government.

Unsurprisingly, the new Jewish President Zelensky has very close links to one of the Jewish oligarchs, Kolomoyskij. It turns out that Kolomoysky owns the TV station 1 + 1, which was responsible for Zelensky's career for national fame. It was also reported that " Kolomoysky's media company provided the comedian's presidential campaign with security solutions and logistical support. "The same article that wrote this, mentioned that Zelensky traveled 14 times in two years to two foreign homes in Geneva and Tel Aviv.

As expected, Kolomoyskij himself is involved in a series of corruption charges and lawsuits against him. He had been the owner of Ukraine's largest bank, Privatbank, before putting it under state ownership in 2016 with executive orders. During his time as a bank owner, it was reported that " 97 percent of its corporate loans had gone to Kolomoysky's 'related business partners' and [his Jewish partner and fellow oligarch] Bogolyubov ".

An independent review found that Privatbank had been subjected to " a large-scale and coordinated fraud for at least a 10-year period until December 2016 ". Kolomoyskij has also been charged with embezzling over $ 5 billion from the bank. And he and his "right hand", the aforementioned Korban, have been involved in numerous other crimes, including murder, kidnapping, arson and bribery. Really a nice bunch!

And then we have George Soros . The Jewish billionaire from Hungary (and the US citizen) has direct links to the scandal, with roots going back years; much of this stems from his long-standing love of influencing Eastern European governments. He has long held interests in Ukraine, and is reported to have had regular meetings with the former Prime Minister of Ukraine, the Jew Volodymyr Groysman . Soros is also a main investor in the Anti-Corruption Center (AntAC), a group formed in Ukraine in 2012, ostensibly to "fight corruption" but almost certainly act to manipulate the government.
 
Recently it has emerged that Soros Open Society Foundations has for years been in contact with key people in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding policies regarding Ukraine, not least with the Jewess Victoria Nuland and (can we say that?) The alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella . Other alleged contacts are difficult to confirm. Alex Jones and others have accused the prosecution witness Fiona Hill of being a "Sorority mole", which of course she vehemently rebuffed in her private testimony. The exact nature of that contact remains to be discovered.

Media coverage, media angling
With this remarkable blend of many members from a single small ethnicity, one would think that objective and independent media would illuminate and investigate this fact. Of course, as long as the same media was not dominated by this only small ethnic group, then no discussion was expected at all about the matter. And in fact, that's exactly what we have: No discussion at all about it.

Sure, there are mentions in passing that Sondland is "the son of a Holocaust survivor " - which allows readers to conclude on his Jewish identity - and sweeping references to anti-Semitism when anyone criticizes Sondland, but that's the only thing. Absolutely nothing about Schiff, Nadler, Goldman, Zelensky, and the others. Not even Joe DiGenova's accusations that George Soros " controls the Department of Foreign Affairs" contain any mention of Soro's Jewishness - that would have been far too far. Since it is well known that Soros is a Jew, it is now officially considered [after decree of the Anti-Defamation League / oa.] That it is anti-Semitic to say that George Soros is influential.


Jerrold "Jerry" Nadler during a visit to a Jewish Orthodox school in Brooklyn. Photo: Jerrold Nadler (CC BY 2.0). On Wednesday, he chairs the Congressional Committee in Congress to write the prosecution against Trump.

But we cannot just accuse our mass media of angling things for the benefit of the Jews if we have no facts - in this case, the names of them. So, consider the following list of journalists and broadcasters.

For a moment, let's focus on the three largest opinion-forming news channels: CNN, MSNBC and Fox News. Start with MSNBC - a media network owned and managed by NBC Universal, which in turn is owned by Comcast. Both parent companies have clear Jewish character in the top management. Brian Roberts and David Cohen on Comcast, and Robert Greenblatt , Bonnie Hammer , Noah Oppenheim , Andrew Lack , Mark Lazarus and Ron Meyer on NBC Universal . Regarding the more visible people in the box, find on MSNBC Rachel Maddow , Chuck Todd , Katy Tur, Andrea Mitchell, and Ari Melber . Everyone is a Jew.

Trump's beloved Fox News has its own Jewish actors in characters such as Howard Kurtz , Mark Levin , Geraldo Rivera and Chris Wallace . But perhaps even more indicative is Fox's constantly recurring pro-Israeli stance as articulated by types like (non-Jew) Sean Hannity - and probably driven by Fox's rabid Zionist co-owner, the Murdoch family .

Most obviously, however, is CNN, whose program manager has a noticeable inclination toward the Jewish side. We can quickly ascertain this by looking at the Wikipedia article "List of CNN staff" where we find the section "Political and legal analysts". Of the 26 listed names, at least 16 (61 percent) are Jews: Dana Bash, Richard Ben-Veniste , Rebecca Buck , Carl Bernstein , Wolf Blitzer , Gloria Borger , Harry Enten , Jamie Gangel , David Gergen , David Gregory , Maggie Haberman , John King (convert), Josh Rogin ,Jake Tapper , Jeff Toobin and Samantha Vinograd . The subsequent two sections reveal further Jewish names such as David Axelrod , David Frum , Peter Beinart , Steve Israel , Jason Kander , Sally Kohn , Catherine Rampell , Hilary Rosen , Aaron Miller , Tony Blinken and Michael Weiss . And then we have not mentioned others as the news anchor John Berman ; frequent guests such as Bianna Golodryga , Max Boot, andAlan Dershowitz ; converts like Kate Bolduan ; and non-Jews with Jewish causes like Christiane Amanpour . All this is undoubtedly supported by CNN chief Jeff Zucker , who in turn is responsible for his corporate executives at Warner Media, namely the Jews of Richard Pepler and David Levy .

Because of this situation, it is little surprise that during the judicial process the Jewish parade receives little or no attention. It's actually to be expected. Something else would have been amazing.

Some Conclusions
This rare insight into American Judeocracy allows us to draw some plausible conclusions. First and foremost about the power of money. The Jewish elite holds positions that involve influence and power, not because they are particularly talented, smart, noble or well-liked, but rather because in practice they buy into power. They are experts in using such social positions to expand their wealth and personal network.

It is a self-reinforcing cycle of the most malicious kind: to use wealth to create wealth, to use its power to grow even more powerful. And they do so in what most people consider to be highly unethical (when they are not even directly illegal). Everyone thinks that "money corrupts politics", but they never acknowledge that the majority of political money - roughly between 25 percent and 50 percent, depending on the election campaign and party - comes from a single source: the Jewish lobby.

Once they have put the money in their pockets, politicians write or change laws to further increase Jewish power. Again, this is very much a self-serving behavior. The ultimate goal of all these activities is, simply put, Jewish power and wealth; not justice, not honesty, not equality, not efficiency, not mercy. That is why there is no such thing in our government.

Secondly, we see how Jews have come to govern the two major political parties. There are no opposing views, no real third alternative. Even a microscopic threat that comes from groups like Green Parity must be controlled - for example, by its leader who is a Jewess: Jill Stein .

Our two dominant parties that clash in death matches on almost every issue and almost never agree on anything, find a common thing only in one issue: Jewish and Israeli interests. Jews who are nominated for legal and cabinet positions receive immediate cross-party support. It also receives financial support for Israel, which amounts to around $ 6 billion a year, every year.

Hate crime laws are signed and "white power", "white nationalism", "anti-Semitism" and "racism" are routinely and thoughtlessly condemned by both sides. Reasonable and peaceful protests against Israeli crime, such as boycott, disinvestment and sanctions (BDS) related acts, are automatically condemned and even banned. Even the freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Supplement, which is otherwise sacred, is trampled upon and fought whenever such things threaten Jewish interests.

Third, we see a proven Jewish strategy to create confusion and distraction from the real underlying problems. False, superficial political conflicts mask consistent interests that always flow beneath the surface. Jews can fight among themselves for how much power they should have, but if those as a group feel threatened, they quickly unite and go to joint attack on those who threaten their interests. They use the most brutal herd hunter methods against those they perceive as enemies. Only the strongest and most principled opponents survive.

The fourth conclusion is the astonishing indulgence and submissiveness of non-Jews, which stands in stark contrast to their own long-term interests. We cannot believe that they behave like this completely blindly, and we must therefore assume that they are fully aware of their actions and the consequences thereof. Mediagoers like Sean Hannity , Anderson Cooper , Chris Cuomo , Laura Ingraham , David Muir , Lester Holt and others are guilty of the most disgusting and treacherous crimes one can commit: They sell out their own nation and race for personal gain.

The same goes for the traitors in corporate management and in the government. Political leaders such as Mike Pence , Nancy Pelosi , Devin Nunes , Chuck Grassley , Mitch McConnell, and others are criminal traitors to the American nation; they cover up and defend the hidden power - the true "deep state" - thereby exposing us, and the entire planet, to countless sorrows. In a truly just world, they would all be held accountable and pay for their sins.

The biggest betrayal of all, of course, comes from Donald Trump. Because of his unpredictable and infantile behavior, it can be difficult to judge how he thinks. But some things are relatively clear. No matter how you count, Trump is little more than a characterless, half-literate egocentric of a pathological magnitude.

But because of his extremely thin margin of popular support, he is forced - really compelled - to appeal to true conservatives, the working class and the right-wing dissident. He clearly has no real desire to help these groups, and he has no sympathy for their difficult situation.

Trump is the prototype of a privileged, wealthy elitist with no contact with reality. But in order to maintain power he has to throw us a meat bone every now and then. We who are in the dissident right can accept it and do something small with it, but we must not expect much more than that. Trump's real politics and his decision will definitely serve his well-off comrades and the Jewish power brokers he works with.

But it's worse than that. Trump is such a degenerate idiot and racial traitor that he married his own beautiful daughter to the Jewish elite, possibly only for the money and power this would give him. (Obviously, she says very little about her judgment that she agreed to it.) The couple Bill and Hillary Clinton did the same with their (much more common) daughter Chelsea Clinton - and almost simultaneously, 2009-2010.

It is perhaps no coincidence that at the same moment as Hillary and Trump cemented their respective families with the [Jewish] tribe, both rose to the heights of influence within their respective party. If the Jewish lobby cannot have a Jew as president, a family-related goy is the next best thing. Therefore, the 2016 presidential race can best be seen as a fight between two phalanges of the Jewish lobby; each had their favorite candidate and the lobby was guaranteed to win, no matter how the election went. So the game was rigged.

A fifth conclusion is that conditions will hardly improve in the near future. Consider the upcoming presidential election in 2020. Democrats have a decent chance of winning the presidency, but unfortunately their party is permeated even more by the Jewish environment than the Republicans. They receive a larger percentage of campaign money from the Jewish lobby, and their liberal Jewish followers in the mass media are by far more than their neoconservative counterparts (who are all anti-Trumpists). And look at the current collection of presidential candidates. There are currently 18 active candidates. Among them are no less than five Jews: Bernie Sanders , Tom Steyer , Marianne Williamson , Michael Bennett , and the latestMichael Bloomberg. God help us if we finally get a Jewish President.

However, all other competitors are almost equally damaging: pro-Israeli, anti-white, "anti-racist", promilitary, etc. - with Tulsi Gabbard as the only exception, whose persistent presence in the election campaign is something akin to a minor miracle. Only she seems to be willing and able to confront the Jewish power structure behind the Democrats. (Note it, alternate right!)

But Gabbard has almost no chance of winning the nomination, and so we get yet another pro-Israeli Democrat to compete against a pro-Israeli Trump whose latest sign of faith and holiness vis-à-vis Israel was to declare that settlements on the West Bank are legal, which constitutes a violation of the historical hypocritical American attitude that they are illegal.

Sixthly, and finally, the dominance of Judaism is so overwhelming that all other issues add up to insignificance. Therefore, regardless of heart, every American should first and foremost fight against Jewish power, because before it is brought to light and undermined, all other endeavors will surely fail unless they coincide with Jewish interests.

The lobby effectively subverts every other political issue and shapes them according to their own needs, and therefore everyone should fight that power if we are to have any hope of solving our many concerns. Environmentally conscious, health-care-for-all advocates, anti-abortion advocates, night watchman advocates, tax opponents, liberals, conservatives, socialists, libertarians ... your endeavor is doomed if you cannot recruit substantial Jewish support, and it is impossible if you challenge any of them Jewish lobby works for. It's that simple - and at the same time difficult - it is.

Philosophy Doctor Thomas Dalton has among other things written the books Debating the Holocaust (2015), Hitler on the Jews (2019) and Goebbels on the Jews (2019). His most recent book is The Jewish Hand in the World Wars , published this year by Castle Hill , a publisher whose books are often stopped by the Jewish lobby for dealing with issues Jews and Zionists want to silence and are therefore rarely available for purchase through major bookstores such as Amazon.

The original article was originally published on Occidental Observer and has source references. It can be read in English here . Due to Swedish legislation restricting the constitutionally protected freedom of expression, some sentences and formulations have changed somewhat.
 
Oh course you didn't "say it was their fault." You're very careful not to "say" much of anything ever and if you do you can be counted on most of the time to "say" something contradictory as soon as someone disagrees.
But what you did is implied it was their fault by "saying" they could have gotten off the bus which makes sense to you somehow. That's something that you did "say" and in looking to the victims for fault where there was none you came up with one that makes no sense at all.
If they had gotten off the bus and the boys had gotten off the bus with them on some random street, how do you think that might have worked out?

Your reliance on repetition of what other people "say" and your total lack of ability to contribute anything of your own that even makes sense make me wonder why you bother. It's like you wanted to be part of the conversation that was started by @reelfountain where the point was that these women are probably lying. The context was based on two things. First is that blacks were probably responsible and the second was that the media was making a big deal out of this because the women are lesbians. She wrote about it quite a bit and if I remember correctly part of it was that the media wanted to make it about the women being lesbians and the other part was that it was probably their fault.
So you pop up with this idea that they could have and should have got off the bus, as if that would be easy, and as if that would solve the problem.
But of course you didn't "say it was their fault" because you perpetuate this image of being completely unbiased, even though that isn't true at all.
You finally put your psychobabble where your mouth is. :oops:
 
Back
Top Bottom