"Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality

[MindlessRuffian]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

pansexual ftw!

 

[mcspyke77]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

What Difference Does It Make?

 

[Girl-with-the-Thorn]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

Ok, here's what I voted on my own poll:

Other.

The reason for this is because although a lot of evidence (what he's said in interviews, 'I Can Have Both, etc.) points to him being either bisexual or most likely pansexual, I also think he genuinely doesn't really know, and that sex isn't the most important thing to him anyway. Therefore he subverts and denies any concept of classification, in a way.

In a nutshell, he's all of these, and none of them.

Just my two cents.

 

[CrystalGeezer]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

Maybe he's napsexual. A little afternoon snoozy, maybe a little poke for fun. Sounds good to me.

 

[Chileiceman]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

Maybe he just makes love to himself. That's what I do

 

[DeanIsNotDead]

'Will you send me some pornography? Do you HAVE a girlfriend? Do you LIKE girls? I have a girlfriend called Annalisa. We're both bisexual. Real hip, huh? I hate sex.'



and still, in contempt of the written evidence, I voted for the option in the middle beginning with an 'a' and ending with 'sexual'

bored and sated,

me

 

[DeanIsNotDead]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

Maybe he just makes love to himself. That's what I do

the best thing one can do nowadays, really

 

[[email protected]]

....Does this count??( And,... does it have anything to do with anything anyway???)
On the "Kill Uncle tour", I bought 2 of the T-shirts of "Motor cycle Au Pair boy" Morrissey " Arm over head, bare body" pose, for a friend and me ( My mate couldn't make the gig ( An unfortunate Accident, involving stairs...) so I got him a shirt anyway...
A few days later, we were both wearing the shirts in a rather Rough pub in Livvypool, and the local Hard- Nut Pool-Players wanted to kill us, because we were Obviously "f***in' Dirty f*****s" ( we were not....).
( we BOTH smelled Nicer than the Retards, and had had a Bath/shower each that day....more than the pricks at the Pool-table had...).
Nah,... on second thoughts, its NOT that Relevant.....sorry....

 

[Rupert]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

he's all of these, and none of them.

Spot on.

 

[bored]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

Maybe he just makes love to himself. That's what I do

Be honest.. it's more lust than love

 

[dunya]

Not being willing to wrestle with the search function, I was wondering...

has there been much discussion on why Morrissey chooses to maintain an ambivalent public stance on this issue?

Is it a political statement, such as "society needs to develop to the point where gender and sexual identity are irrelevant to status, opportunity, acceptance" therefore refusing to say is a way of insisting it is/should be considered of no importance?

Or is it simply "none of anyone's business, so no I won't tell you"?

Or a means of maintaining his unique position, as an artist and as an Icon?

Is it really good for business?

Is Morrissey just enjoying being awkward for the sake of it?

Is it because "there are worse things than being talked about..."?

Or because he wishes any relationship he has, or would like to have, to be free from the pressure of publicity, intrusion, and speculation?

By asking "How do I define him" perhaps we are missing the point...it doesn't matter.

 

[Kewpie]

actually

Not being willing to wrestle with the search function, I was wondering...

has there been much discussion on why Morrissey chooses to maintain an ambivalent public stance on this issue?

Is it a political statement, such as "society needs to develop to the point where gender and sexual identity are irrelevant to status, opportunity, acceptance" therefore refusing to say is a way of insisting it is/should be considered of no importance?

Or is it simply "none of anyone's business, so no I won't tell you"?

Or a means of maintaining his unique position, as an artist and as an Icon?

Is it really good for business?

Is Morrissey just enjoying being awkward for the sake of it?

Is it because "there are worse things than being talked about..."?

Or because he wishes any relationship he has, or would like to have, to be free from the pressure of publicity, intrusion, and speculation?

By asking "How do I define him" perhaps we are missing the point...it doesn't matter.

Earlier this year in bored's thread Why doesn't Morrissey have a significant other?, some of the questions are discussed.

I assume Morrissey prefers to keep some things in private.

 

[Worm]

has there been much discussion on why Morrissey chooses to maintain an ambivalent public stance on this issue?

Is it a political statement, such as "society needs to develop to the point where gender and sexual identity are irrelevant to status, opportunity, acceptance" therefore refusing to say is a way of insisting it is/should be considered of no importance?

Yes.

Or is it simply "none of anyone's business, so no I won't tell you"?

Or a means of maintaining his unique position, as an artist and as an Icon?

These reasons too, but less important than the first reason above.

Is it really good for business?

Yes.

Is Morrissey just enjoying being awkward for the sake of it?

No.

Is it because "there are worse things than being talked about..."?

Perish the thought.

Or because he wishes any relationship he has, or would like to have, to be free from the pressure of publicity, intrusion, and speculation?

Probably.

By asking "How do I define him" perhaps we are missing the point...it doesn't matter.

No. Making the attempt to define Morrissey is part of his strength. He gets people to think about certain issues in new ways.

I think it's important to distinguish between making the attempt and coming to ironclad conclusions, though. The idea is to try and define Morrissey with an open mind, using your imagination, all with the understanding that you'll never really define him. When you think Morrissey is just putting on an act and you can discern "the obvious truth" behind his "public posturing" (for example: "He's gay. Duh") you're stumbling down the wrong path.

 

[Girl-with-the-Thorn]

Yes.



These reasons too, but less important than the first reason above.



Yes.



No.



Perish the thought.



Probably.



No. Making the attempt to define Morrissey is part of his strength. He gets people to think about certain issues in new ways.

I think it's important to distinguish between making the attempt and coming to ironclad conclusions, though. The idea is to try and define Morrissey with an open mind, using your imagination, all with the understanding that you'll never really define him. When you think Morrissey is just putting on an act and you can discern "the obvious truth" (for example: "He's gay. Duh".) you're stumbling down the wrong path.

Worm, you really are spot on. Your posts are always thought-provoking.

 

[Worm]

Worm, you really are spot on. Your posts are always thought-provoking.

Thanks.

 

[Girl-with-the-Thorn]

Thanks.

You're welcome.

 

[This charming man.]

Re: "Not Again!" Mozzer's Sexuality (poll)

What on earth is pansexual supposed to be? Sex with the eyes?

To make the description more clearer, I would say that if you're pansexual, then it means you tolerate and participate in all kinds of sexual activity, as long as it is consensual between adults and is engaged in the privacy of your own four walls.

 

[Oh my god. it's Robby!]

yes! what I voted for is winning

 

[Happy Maudlin]

I would reckon Morrissey to a I-don't-care-who-you-are-just-love-me sexual. But I chose gay anyway, that seems appropriate for him at the moment.

 

[pewtavert]

His preference is the same as Michael Stipe......call it whatever you want to, they are both the best at what they do which is all that I really care about!!!!!!