Identification of Bradley Steyn - true-to-you.net

TTY: Identification

http://true-to-you.net/morrissey_news_140803_01

3 August 2014

3 August 2014 / identification

It is understood that the music venue security officer who is harassing Morrissey also uses the name Brad HawkSteyn, and is known online as Springy.


I don't even know where to begin in addressing why this update is problematic. I can't see how it won't end up backfiring horribly.
 
Sever criminal law from civil and state the forum one is in (ie. civil or criminal). Then, state who the parties are: TMZ, Donnie (Moz's manager), Morrissey, David, etc. Then, state who is going after who, is it the government vs. someone - if so criminal. Is it a person vs. a person - if so civil. Find out which jurisdiction's law applies (conflict of laws), in this case apparently the State of California since the alleged suggestion to harm another took place in Santa Ana or Los Angeles. Name the crime (criminal law) or cause of action (civil law). State the elements of the cause of action or crime. Apply the known facts to the cause of action or crime. Come to conclusion. IRAC. What is the issue? What is the rule? Apply rule to facts. Conclusion - reason your way to one. As to MozRecording's point, if we are talking criminal assault or battery, not only must there be a threat, the threat must be imminent. If that element is not met, a party cannot be convicted of criminal assault (threat) or battery (offensive or unconsented touching).
 
Last edited:
Having reread the original Moz-solo post (the one from TMZ), I've noticed some pretty glaring deletions and examples of vagueness that call into question the essential usefulness of the original declarations--the ones that have all of us up in our proverbial arms. I quote that post liberally as follows:
According to Steyn ... Morrissey hated the guy who ran one of his fan websites -- Morrissey-solo.com -- which he felt invaded his personal life. [all of that is speculative hearsay] Steyn claims in the suit Morrissey asked [whom?] if there was a way the fan [the fan or the guy who ran one of his fan websites] "could get hurt [how? financially? physically? emotionally [e.g. by being barred from a concert]?."

Steyn claims [Steyn made a claim right in front of Morrissey? or Steyn now claims that "right in front of Morrissey..."] right in front of Morrissey ... [why the ellipsis??] the tour manager asked [the tour manager asked!!] if the fan [the fan?/which fan? or the guy who ran one of his fan websites] "could be gotten rid of." Then they [they who? Morrissey and tour manager? Steyn and Morrissey? Steyn and tour manager? Steyn and some other previously-unidentified person?] discussed how to get the fan's home address [to be used to deliver a summons?].

The biggest problem is that the greatest unambiguous claim laid is against the tour manager--not against Morrissey. Morrissey can't be responsible for every off-the-cuff comment or question made by Morrissey's tour manager, can Morrissey?

You are just so spot on with this, great way to break it down.
 
Re: TTY: Identification

Can't believe you folks are surprised about this. This is after all the same Moz who once said he wouldn't feel guilty if one of his fans killed Thatcher in a twisted bid for his attention. I for one would happily punch this Springy jerk-off in the face for the Mozzster. I never liked South Africans anyway, bunch of irritating twats
 
This is getting better, Julia can post pictures that Donnie takes of Morrissey straight from their jail cells!

In my cell, well I followed you
 
Finally, some lucidity.

Everyone take a deep breath, hear these words in your head as voiced by Freddie Mercury and everything will be fine.

Lighten up, love. Why so serious and dreary all the time? The man is not that bad - he has never been accused of molesting anyone, of killing anyone, of beating anyone, of abusing or sleeping around with young groupies... Now and again he makes OTT comments. Big deal. In the scale of things it's not that bad when you see what men are capable of. You keep saying his defensers keep minimizing what he says. I think on the opposite you really blow things way out of proportion (a spree killing in a children's ward, no less? It seems the man has influenced you.)

Perhaps you should shut up if you don't know what you are talking about. Here is a part of another post that I just made somewhere else just for you with the bit that answers your drivels

How many people know that the Hustler shirt that Morrissey's band was wearing during the Nobel peace prize performance was referencing an American pornographic magazine? Not many I imagine because Hustler isn't really known elsewhere and too many too lazy to look such things up.

mozpeace2-12_at_121409_PM.png


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler

"Of particular infamy are Hustler's cartoons, which have often featured blatantly violent and misogynistic themes. A study lead by Judith Reisman and funded by the United States Department of Justice found that Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler cartoons frequently contain sexual depictions of children.[3] Gang rape, botched abortions, incest, pedophilia and racism have all been featured at one time or another as recurring motifs in the cartoons. One long-running cartoon, "Chester the Molester", presented the ongoing misadventures of a pedophile in his attempts to coerce young children into sexual activity with him."

World peace is none of your business *smug grin at end of video with daughter of Frank Sinatra, connection between Mafia and US president* (which I learned from a US elite university professor)... kick the pride down the aisle lalalala.... let her fall down the stairs lalalala.... children .... rabies.... blablablabla
 
In America, no. There has to be a threat that he would do it. Wishing someone harm is not illegal. As you should know from the "I hope he dies in a car crash" comment from Morrissey about Rogan. Trolls know how to pick their words.

Yes I have tried explaining this notion to some on this site but their heads are so busy with this soap opera that don't really have time to stop and think.
 
How many people know that the Hustler shirt that Morrissey's band was wearing during the Nobel peace prize performance was referencing an American pornographic magazine?

Most people around the world have heard of Hustler magazine.
Also commonly known is the term "hustler" to mean a prostitute or similar.
Morrissey may have meant either.
 
Yes I have tried explaining this notion to some on this site but their heads are so busy with this soap opera that don't really have time to stop and think.

If I was to seek to impose a totalitarian state in this or any other country I would need people like you, keene, Orson, IB and others to impose it. You are blind followers who leave their brains at the door. What are you doing on Wednesday?
 
Maybe this "identification" post was made because it is "common knowledge" what gets posted on TTY gets posted on here. Maybe it was done in hope that the Morrissey soloist will come up with new information. I have a sneaky suspicion some kind of game is being played and the good posters on this site are being the pawns.
 
Maybe this "identification" post was made because it is "common knowledge" what gets posted on TTY gets posted on here. Maybe it was done in hope that the Morrissey soloist will come up with new information. I have a sneaky suspicion some kind of game is being played and the good posters on this site are being the pawns.

Bingo. Its obvious that no one here goes to more than 1 or 2 shows, and no one is aware of the rumors circulating about Bradley long before this incident.
 
What I have learned so far is that he looks like an easy-going family guy who doesn't seem like he would accept a request to do a hit, but at the same time he does have an intimidating build and appears capable of it.

Edit: Also, people said that he likes bacon but I didn't see that reference.

Maybe this "identification" post was made because it is "common knowledge" what gets posted on TTY gets posted on here. Maybe it was done in hope that the Morrissey soloist will come up with new information. I have a sneaky suspicion some kind of game is being played and the good posters on this site are being the pawns.
 
Last edited:
He kinda looks like a douchebag imo.
 
I think the reason Morrissey published this information is because there are certain elements of libel that must be proven. This includes publishing a written statement that the accusations made against him are false (first TTY statement) and by also clearly identifying the individual (Steyn) (second TTY statement). Looks to me that he's covering all grounds.

Sorry if this has been pointed out. I haven't read through the entire thread.
 
What I have learned so far is that he looks like an easy-going family guy who doesn't seem like he would accept a request to do a hit, but at the same time he does have an intimidating build and appears capable of it.

Edit: Also, people said that he likes bacon but I didn't see that reference.

There's a bacon pic on his Facebook page. Inexplicably. Or maybe he missed it while working for Moz and a picture was saying a thousand words. Or he's particularly fond of bacon photography. Or it's a sign he wasn't bringing home enough of it and was available for hitman work to compensate.

Hey CG, are two pieces of bacon parallel to each other the international cryptic symbol for Hired Gun? I bet it is.
 
If I was to seek to impose a totalitarian state in this or any other country I would need people like you, keene, Orson, IB and others to impose it. You are blind followers who leave their brains at the door. What are you doing on Wednesday?

Ah, vintage Barleycorn drivel. Liking a record or an artist doesn't make you a blind follower. Out in the sad recesses of his diseased mind JB probably is a charismatic dictator adored by his doting loyal subjects. Back in reality, of course, nobody could care less about him. Do I like Morrissey's album? Yes. Would I blindly follow a deranged psychological douchebag like Stalin, Charles Manson, or Barleycorn. Nope.
 
Last edited:
If Morrissey actually made these comments, I wonder if they were uttered as a joke, or sarcastic comments. Maybe Bradley/Springy took something literally instead of figuratively/metaphorically. Or... maybe somebody just wants some money. Morrissey ordering a hit on someone seems unreal.
 
Why do all the high profile members of this community have to be in one camp or another? For Moz or against Moz? Are people not able to engage logic? Is it easier to throw insults to anyone whose point of view seems to contradict that whose side you're on? Carry on using the fighting talk guys, you're looking really good there!

You really are asking too much
 
Sever criminal law from civil and state the forum one is in (ie. civil or criminal). Then, state who the parties are: TMZ, Donnie (Moz's manager), Morrissey, David, etc. Then, state who is going after who, is it the government vs. someone - if so criminal. Is it a person vs. a person - if so civil. Find out which jurisdiction's law applies (conflict of laws), in this case apparently the State of California since the alleged suggestion to harm another took place in Santa Ana or Los Angeles. Name the crime (criminal law) or cause of action (civil law). State the elements of the cause of action or crime. Apply the known facts to the cause of action or crime. Come to conclusion. IRAC. What is the issue? What is the rule? Apply rule to facts. Conclusion - reason your way to one. As to MozRecording's point, if we are talking criminal assault or battery, not only must there be a threat, the threat must be imminent. If that element is not met, a party cannot be convicted of criminal assault (threat) or battery (offensive or unconsented touching).

Exactamundo! Well put, BG. And incidentally, for this reason, broccoli_spears never had a case. Morrissey is much smarter than all you 'tards, he knows what he's doing. Consider yourselves easily trolled ... as usual. But if davidt was dead, I'd say it would be a glorious occasion. He is a two-faced lying sociopath not unlike Ted Bundy, who belongs behind bars. Tseng is a greedy, money-hungry crybaby. tick tock tick tock. I have a statement from !Viva Hate! himself confessing to being assisted by David Tseng to troll/harass people on this website. Tseng would identify people via IP Address and then "release the hounds" as it were. Whatever you say about Morrissey, Tseng is ten times worse due to his ginormous insecurities. When !Viva Hate! threw this fact in David's face during a dispute, Tseng threatened to ban him if he didn't "shut up". David Tseng is a piece of lying trash who is only interested in using people. He deserves everything...and I do mean EVERYTHING he gets. Now go call your cops you little pussies.
 
oh...

Exactamundo! Well put, BG. And incidentally, for this reason, broccoli_spears never had a case. Morrissey is much smarter than all you 'tards, he knows what he's doing. Consider yourselves easily trolled ... as usual. But if davidt was dead, I'd say it would be a glorious occasion. He is a two-faced lying sociopath not unlike Ted Bundy, who belongs behind bars. Tseng is a greedy, money-hungry crybaby. tick tock tick tock. I have a statement from !Viva Hate! himself confessing to being assisted by David Tseng to troll/harass people on this website. Tseng would identify people via IP Address and then "release the hounds" as it were. Whatever you say about Morrissey, Tseng is ten times worse due to his ginormous insecurities. When !Viva Hate! threw this fact in David's face during a dispute, Tseng threatened to ban him if he didn't "shut up". David Tseng is a piece of lying trash who is only interested in using people. He deserves everything...and I do mean EVERYTHING he gets. Now go call your cops you little pussies.
 
Back
Top Bottom