Was I ever any good
Labour to my death.
I can’t even be bothered to listen to the above crap…..
I’m doing the gay disco. Shit
I’m doing the gay disco. Shit
true beauty ? primordial beauty?
I thought I’d just post a fleeting glimpse …
of course ‘in the eye of the beholder’ and all that …
View attachment 95947
thread closed.
Lesbos have distorted perceptions too! It's not about sexuality, it's about priorities. If sexuality is the lens through which you judge people then there's always going to be distortion because beauty cares not for what you find subjectively sexually appealingI submit to you: lesbians. I'll bet Lou de Laâge has her share of lesbian admirers.
Lesbos have distorted perceptions too! It's not about sexuality, it's about priorities. If sexuality is the lens through which you judge people then there's always going to be distortion because beauty cares not for what you find subjectively sexually appealing
Sexuality isn't the sole lens or the only priority, but it's a factor. Humans are sexual. It's a part of our make-up. There may be a benefit to denying sexuality when it comes to religious or contemplative matters, but not when it comes to assessing beauty. If a person focuses too much on the sexual aspect, beauty becomes a base cartoon. But if you remove the sexuality factor completely, then you remove a dimension from beauty and it becomes cold and soulless. Maybe that's why you end up with these tall, spindly, anorexic creatures with dead alien eyes and pinched faces. I'm not going cut off my wiener in order to accept 2+2=5.
So according to your raisonnement, straight women or gay men cannot judge female beauty. That's obviously not true.
So according to your raisonnement, straight women or gay men cannot judge female beauty. That's obviously not true.
BTW, there's something wrong with the percentages in these polls @davidt.
5 votes out of 17 votes (total) does not equal 50% and the total cannot be 170% (it can only ever be 100%).
View attachment 95967
Well how would you describe a beautiful child
then? Naturally, from the perspective of a healthy individual the sexual aspect would not be there, so does that description of a child as beautiful become a cold and soulless judgment?
Judging someone, thing or experience as beautiful doesn’t always have a sexual factor to it, nor does one’s personal sexuality always come into play. Even in celibacy, people, things, experiences can be described as beautiful.
I'm slightly confused re Audrey's point (except that he likes Lou de Laage - that much is clear!)
I apologize for the confusion. I realize I'm declaiming in a lordly, imperious manner on Lou de Laâge's beauty while also insisting that there is no objective truth. To clarify: ultimately, the latter trumps the former. Anything I say on how beautiful someone is should be taken as a subjective opinion.
Yeah, just keep it plain and simple so as to avoid confusing others, and (clearly) yourself. I like your posts, but I think you're guilty of just trying too hard in projecting this 'pompous and clever' schtick. Think who the 'audience' is and you'll be fine.I apologize for the confusion. I realize I'm declaiming in a lordly, imperious manner on Lou de Laâge's beauty while also insisting that there is no objective truth. To clarify: ultimately, the latter trumps the former. Anything I say on how beautiful someone is should be taken as a subjective opinion.