OK I’ll accept that - it wasn’t ‘Trojan horsed’ as such - it was done in plain sight and due to the favourable environment, largely went without challenge. But the political agenda behind doing that was the same and I’m not sure education should really be mixed up with political intent. People are taught in those fields to examine and deconstruct literature, film, art, society solely through the post-modern lens, or at least I was. I could take it with a pinch of salt and go ‘ok this is interesting but I’m going to leave it there’, because really it took the joy out of everything. An image couldn’t just be appreciated on face value for instance - it had to be picked apart and the innate ‘oppression’ exposed and discussed (even though it probably wasn’t even there and was more likely someone’s over-zealous opinion). If I think about that and then think about the claims people are making these days about society, it makes perfect, unsurprising sense.