Site moderation feedback

The dogs wasn't a comparison, all I merely said was that people have no problem admitting that breeds of dog have differing IQ's yet find it a difficult subject when applying the same logic to humans. In essence I was comparing ALL PEOPLE to dogs.But among every thing I said, if that is the point you want to hang your hat on, have at it...................
It's not a good look however you want to spin it.
 
Let me put it this way, how offended would you be by a 'kick an asian' day or a 'kick a black' day? It's OK to kick a ginger.

About 1 to 2 percent of the human population has red hair. Redheads have genes to thank for their tresses. Research shows red hair usually results from a mutation in a gene called MC1R, which codes for the melanocortin-1 receptor. The pigment found in redhair that makes it red is called pheomelanin.

Asians and blacks are not mutants and they are everywhere, therefore, there is no fun to be had kicking them. But Gingers...you really have to search them out over here so you pretty much have to kick one when you see one. If you think about it, you could call it "Kick a Mutant Day", which I think everyone (other than Gingers) could get behind. :eek:;)o_O
 
So you agree with Hitler's good ideas but can't endorse his whole program? I think you need to make up your mind. If your friends see you caving in like this they might think you're soft.

I don't endorse any program. You keep playing this game. Hitler was right to want to protect his nation from porn and subversion, he was also wrong about many things. However, me agreeing with 1 recognizing the subversion taking place and 2 identifying the persons responsible does not equate in anyway, shape or form of supporting NAZIism. Maybe take that IQ test again because this concept seems lost on you
 
About 1 to 2 percent of the human population has red hair. Redheads have genes to thank for their tresses. Research shows red hair usually results from a mutation in a gene called MC1R, which codes for the melanocortin-1 receptor. The pigment found in redhair that makes it red is called pheomelanin.

Asians and blacks are not mutants and they are everywhere, therefore, there is no fun to be had kicking them. But Gingers...you really have to search them out over here so you pretty much have to kick one when you see one. If you think about it, you could call it "Kick a Mutant Day", which I think everyone (other than Gingers) could get behind. :eek:;)o_O
No sorry. Don't agree, evennow. You shouldn't be talking in such terms. It's something that has to be taken seriously. I know how I feel when people pick on ginger haired people and it's not nice. There has to be a change of tact.
 
Let's make gingerism as hateful as any other kind of discrimination. It's not a laughing matter any more
 
So you agree with Hitler's good ideas but can't endorse his whole program? I think you need to make up your mind. If your friends see you caving in like this they might think you're soft.
A quick question because you've leveled this type of argument at me before.

'Is it possible to agree with ONE thing someone has said while condemning them as a whole?'

You tend to try and play this game of 'well if you agree with something someone has said that must mean you endorse EVERYTHING they have ever said or stood for,' which is really rather intellectually dishonest. I find myself agreeing with different things Jimmy Dore says all the time, yet on the whole would disavow his progressive policies.
 
Is there a difference?
Do you think that's a clever comment? I think it exposes your ignorance and destroys all of your credibility, not that there ever was much to start with. But if you talked about the Rothschilds and used facts you might be able to sell some of your "Hitler, but not the bad parts" message to some people. You just seem ignorant and I'm not even going into grammar and spelling because that isn't always a good indicator. At this point I'd have to think you're either stupid or willfully ignorant, and I just feel like you wanted to go back to some alt-right forum and brag about what you've achieved here. But I think if anything you've just become a pinata.
 
Do you think that's a clever comment? I think it exposes your ignorance and destroys all of your credibility, not that there ever was much to start with. But if you talked about the Rothschilds and used facts you might be able to sell some of your "Hitler, but not the bad parts" message to some people. You just seem ignorant and I'm not even going into grammar and spelling because that isn't always a good indicator. At this point I'd have to think you're either stupid or willfully ignorant, and I just feel like you wanted to go back to some alt-right forum and brag about what you've achieved here. But I think if anything you've just become a pinata.

You are retarded. I am not alt right. You ignore every point someone makes to you without discussing anything myself or others have said. You keep using scare tactics with Hitlers name so you don't have to deal with the content
 
No sorry. Don't agree, evennow. You shouldn't be talking in such terms. It's something that has to be taken seriously. I know how I feel when people pick on ginger haired people and it's not nice. There has to be a change of tact.

You know I'm joking right? I agree it is wrong to pick on any subset of humanity, or even a particular individual for any reason.

I have the biggest problem with the highlighted statement above. Some of the biggest changes in the way humans interact with each other can be traced back to a comedic enlightening from the performances of great comics like Richard Pryor for example. To take a serious topic and turn it on its side so that people can see that what they have held as truth might need to be reconsidered is a real gift.

Comedy can be used to make a message palatable like putting a pill in food so a child will eat it. Don't discount laughter it can bring a message home in a way far better and more powerfully than any pontificating or lecturing ever could.
 
You are retarded. I am not alt right. You ignore every point someone makes to you without discussing anything myself or others have said. You keep using scare tactics with Hitlers name so you don't have to deal with the content
adolf hitler was the leader of nazi germany and he started world war 2 when he invaded the country of Poland on september 1st, 1939. he ordered his SS to exterminate millions of people with firing squads at first but eventually gas chambers.
 
You know I'm joking right? I agree it is wrong to pick on any subset of humanity, or even a particular individual for any reason.

I have the biggest problem with the highlighted statement above. Some of the biggest changes in the way humans interact with each other can be traced back to a comedic enlightening from the performances of great comics like Richard Pryor for example. To take a serious topic and turn it on its side so that people can see that what they have held as truth might need to be reconsidered is a real gift.

Comedy can be used to make a message palatable like putting a pill in food so a child will eat it. Don't discount laughter it can bring a message home in a way far better and more powerfully than any pontificating or lecturing ever could.
i like porn.
 
A quick question because you've leveled this type of argument at me before.

'Is it possible to agree with ONE thing someone has said while condemning them as a whole?'

You tend to try and play this game of 'well if you agree with something someone has said that must mean you endorse EVERYTHING they have ever said or stood for,' which is really rather intellectually dishonest. I find myself agreeing with different things Jimmy Dore says all the time, yet on the whole would disavow his progressive policies.

I do? Do you have other examples? Don't accuse me of being "intellectually dishonest" when you're pretending to just ask questions but coming down on the side of a blatant racist who is actively promoting Hitler.
 
You know I'm joking right? I agree it is wrong to pick on any subset of humanity, or even a particular individual for any reason.

I have the biggest problem with the highlighted statement above. Some of the biggest changes in the way humans interact with each other can be traced back to a comedic enlightening from the performances of great comics like Richard Pryor for example. To take a serious topic and turn it on its side so that people can see that what they have held as truth might need to be reconsidered is a real gift.

Comedy can be used to make a message palatable like putting a pill in food so a child will eat it. Don't discount laughter it can bring a message home in a way far better and more powerfully than any pontificating or lecturing ever could.
I wasn't meaning to be harsh, evennow. I just think it's a really serious problem that can't be pushed to one side anymore. It's wrong to kick on ginger haired people. We can't help it.
 
I don't endorse any program. You keep playing this game. Hitler was right to want to protect his nation from porn and subversion, he was also wrong about many things. However, me agreeing with 1 recognizing the subversion taking place and 2 identifying the persons responsible does not equate in anyway, shape or form of supporting NAZIism. Maybe take that IQ test again because this concept seems lost on you

Hitler was protecting the nation from porn! That's an interesting way to look at it!
 
I do? Do you have other examples? Don't accuse me of being "intellectually dishonest" when you're pretending to just ask questions but coming down on the side of a blatant racist who is actively promoting Hitler.

I am not a racist you low IQ gamma. He called you out correctly. You are very dishonest. You conflate and straw man and do everything you can to twist peoples posts towards this discussion that you disagree with
 
Back
Top Bottom